Infrastructure as code (IaC) security is the practice of finding and fixing security misconfigurations in the templates that define your cloud infrastructure, Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes manifests, before they are deployed, so a mistake is caught in a pull request rather than discovered live.
Infrastructure as code (IaC) security is the practice of finding and fixing security misconfigurations in the templates that define your cloud infrastructure, Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes manifests, before they are deployed, so a mistake is caught in a pull request rather than discovered live.
When infrastructure is defined as code, a single template can create hundreds of identical resources, so a single mistake, a storage bucket left public, a security group open to the world, replicates everywhere the template is applied. Cloud misconfiguration is consistently a leading cause of cloud incidents, and IaC is where much of it originates. The flip side is the opportunity: fix the template once and every future deployment is correct by default.
IaC security embeds checks into the development pipeline. Static scanning of Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes manifests flags misconfigurations against baselines like the CIS Benchmarks before the code merges. Policy as code goes further, expressing your security rules as machine-enforced policies (for example, no public storage buckets, or encryption required) that block a non-compliant change at the pipeline gate rather than flagging it after the fact.
The value of IaC security is timing. A misconfiguration caught in a pull request is a one-line change; the same misconfiguration found in production six months later is an incident, an architectural change, and an audit finding. Scanning IaC in CI/CD moves the catch to the cheapest possible point, which is the core idea of shift-left security and DevSecOps.
IaC security (before deployment) and cloud security posture management (after deployment) are complementary. IaC scanning prevents misconfigurations from shipping; CSPM catches drift, the changes made directly in the cloud console that the templates do not reflect. Neither replaces the other. A misconfiguration can enter through a template or through a late-night console change, and a complete program watches both doors.
Fencer scans your infrastructure as code (Terraform, CloudFormation, and Kubernetes manifests) for misconfigurations before they deploy, and pairs it with CSPM on the running cloud, so a misconfiguration is caught in the template and any later drift is caught on the live environment. Findings land in one prioritized queue alongside the rest of your code and cloud risk, and Fencer fixes what it can, a pull request for the template or a direct correction for supported cloud misconfigurations, then re-scans to confirm.