Static analysis that finds, fixes, and confirms, on every commit

SAST is included in all Fencer plans. The Basic plan ($99/mo, up to 3 contributors) runs weekly scans. For the full experience, which is PR scanning on every commit, AI triage, and automatic fix PRs, you need Essentials at $499/mo (10 contributors included, up to 25). Growth at $999/mo adds penetration test management for teams building a broader program. All pricing is published at fencer.dev/pricing, with no quote required to get started.

It covers much of what a pen test finds at the application layer, run on every commit rather than once a year. Authorization flaws, logic bugs, SSRF, injection vulnerabilities: these surface on every PR. For teams that need a formal pen test record for compliance or customer questionnaires, Fencer offers both automated SAST and a human-led pen test, and their findings sit in the same place.

Yes. Fencer's SAST module is available as a standalone offering. Each finding still lands in the Fencer platform, where you can launch the AI fixer and track resolution. If you later want to add SCA, cloud security, or pen testing, they are all in the same place.

Yes. Fencer's investigative agents are specifically designed for the class of vulnerability that pattern matching cannot see: broken object-level authorization (IDOR), missing authorization checks, SSRF, and business-logic flaws. These are the bugs that previously required a manual pen test to surface. They run on every PR as part of the standard scan.

Fencer's published benchmark shows 94-98% false-positive elimination across its test set (142 engineer-reviewed findings, 11 real and 131 false positives). The results and methodology are published at fencer.dev/blog/llm-triage-sast-false-positives. The exact rate depends on your codebase and the types of patterns that trigger; the benchmark gives you a verifiable baseline rather than a marketing claim.

Layer 1 (pattern scanning) and Layer 2 (AI triage) run on every pull request and are designed to be fast. Layer 3 (investigative agents) is more thorough and is configurable: you can target it at specific risk areas or run it on a schedule rather than every PR. The scan runs in Fencer's infrastructure, not yours, so it does not add meaningful latency to your pipeline.

Hybrid SAST is Fencer's three-layer architecture: deterministic pattern scanners (Semgrep and CodeQL) for high-recall detection, an AI triage layer that evaluates each finding in context to eliminate false positives, and investigative agents that reason about authorization flows and business logic. The first layer is fast and produces the same findings every run. The second layer filters the noise. The third catches what no scanner can.

GitHub Advanced Security and Semgrep are pattern-matching SAST tools: they find code that matches a known-dangerous pattern and flag it. That approach generates a lot of false positives, and it cannot find authorization or business-logic flaws because there is no wrong code to match. Fencer adds an AI triage layer that eliminates most of the noise before it reaches your queue, and an investigative-agent layer that reasons about authorization flows and logic on every PR, the class of bug that previously required a pen test.